Senator-judge Raffy Tulfo has urged the House prosecution panel to be more selective in presenting witnesses in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, warning that unnecessary testimony could consume the Senate impeachment court’s time.
During Thursday’s proceedings, October 1, Tulfo questioned the prosecution’s frequent changes to its planned witnesses and reminded the panel that witnesses should provide information directly relevant to the case. His remarks came as the prosecution continued presenting evidence against Duterte.
Tulfo’s comments followed the prosecution’s decision to drop former senator Antonio “Sonny” Trillanes IV from its witness list. The former senator had previously been identified as a potential witness in the presentation involving allegations concerning Duterte’s financial records and alleged wealth.
The senator-judge said the prosecution should avoid presenting witnesses whose testimony could be repetitive or add little to the evidence already submitted before the court. He emphasized the need for the proceedings to remain focused as the Senate works through the large volume of evidence being presented.
The prosecution has been presenting witnesses and documentary evidence concerning several allegations contained in the impeachment complaint, including issues involving Duterte’s use of confidential funds and alleged unexplained wealth.
The proceedings have already involved numerous witnesses, financial documents and records from government agencies. The impeachment court has also been managing objections and procedural disputes between the prosecution and defense as the trial progresses.
Tulfo’s remarks add to previous calls from members of the impeachment court for both sides to maintain efficient and orderly proceedings. The court has previously reminded the prosecution to avoid inappropriate or strongly worded statements while questioning witnesses and to observe courtroom rules.
The prosecution, meanwhile, has maintained that its witnesses and documentary evidence are intended to establish the allegations contained in the impeachment complaint. The defense has challenged various aspects of the prosecution’s evidence and has been given the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses.
The impeachment trial remains ongoing, with the prosecution continuing its presentation before the defense is expected to present its own evidence. The Senate impeachment court will ultimately determine the issues raised in the case based on the evidence and arguments formally presented during the proceedings.
