MANILA, Philippines — The 2026 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE) could be pushed back to November 2028 after a Senate panel advanced a proposal that would also increase the regular term of barangay and SK officials from four years to five years.
The Senate Committee on Local Government approved the measure on August 24, allowing the proposal to move toward plenary deliberations.
But the move does not mean the 2026 elections have already been cancelled.
The proposed reset still needs to pass both chambers of Congress and be enacted into law before the scheduled November 2, 2026 BSKE can officially be moved.
The proposal: From four years to five
Senate Bill No. 2387, filed by Sen. Francis “Chiz” Escudero, seeks to establish a five-year term for barangay officials and members of the Sangguniang Kabataan.
Under the proposal, the next BSKE would be held in November 2028, with succeeding elections conducted every five years.
Escudero has argued that the measure is intended to “fix” the terms of local officials rather than simply postpone an election. His argument is that a five-year cycle would provide greater continuity for barangay governance and give officials more time to implement community programs.
The proposal would also maintain limits on consecutive service. Under the proposed transition provisions, incumbent barangay officials serving their third consecutive term would not be allowed to seek the same position in 2028.
Why the 2026 election is still on the table
For now, November 2, 2026 remains the election date under existing law.
Republic Act No. 12232, approved in August 2025, established the four-year term and set the next BSKE for November 2026 after the previous election schedule was moved.
That means Congress—not the Senate committee alone—will ultimately determine whether the scheduled election proceeds or is legally reset.
The House of Representatives is also considering several separate proposals that would move the BSKE to different dates, including 2027 and 2028. Congressional records show multiple bills addressing the issue are already under consideration.
Comelec has already spent billions
One of the biggest issues surrounding the proposed postponement is the money already spent preparing for the election.
Commission on Elections Chairman George Garcia said Comelec has a ₱19.57-billion budget for the BSKE and has already spent roughly ₱8 billion on preparations, including election materials and personnel-related expenses.
If the elections are postponed, some of those expenditures could become difficult to recover.
The Philippine News Agency separately reported that nearly ₱11 billion in unused BSKE funds could potentially be redirected toward financing the 2028 elections if the polls are postponed.
But the financial issue is not limited to money already spent.
Comelec has warned that it needs an early decision because some election materials have limited shelf lives. The poll body is also preparing to train teachers who would serve as election personnel.
Garcia has asked Congress to clarify the fate of the November election by around the second week of September, ahead of the scheduled filing of certificates of candidacy from September 28 to October 5.
Election watchdogs are pushing back
The proposed reset has also triggered opposition from election watchdogs.
The Legal Network for Truthful Elections (LENTE) and the National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections (Namfrel) objected to postponing the BSKE through a measure framed as a term-setting law.
Their concern is that voters should not be deprived of the opportunity to choose their barangay and youth representatives without a compelling legal and constitutional justification.
Election lawyer Romulo Macalintal has likewise criticized the proposed postponement and indicated that he could challenge efforts to delay the elections. He argued that officials elected in 2023 should receive a fresh mandate in 2026.
The controversy is particularly sensitive because the Supreme Court previously struck down the postponement of the 2022 BSKE, making any new attempt to move barangay elections subject to significant constitutional and legal scrutiny.
What happens to incumbent barangay officials?
This is one of the most important details for voters.
If the proposal becomes law, incumbent barangay and SK officials would remain in office during the transition until the next election cycle.
But the proposal does not simply give everyone an unlimited extension.
Escudero’s bill contains transitional rules designed to account for the additional two years before the proposed 2028 election. Incumbent officials who are already serving their third consecutive term would be treated as having completed the allowable service and would therefore be barred from running for the same position in 2028.
The bigger question: Will 2026 voters actually go to the polls?
That remains unresolved.
The Senate committee’s approval is an important step, but it is not final legislation.
The proposal still has to survive Senate plenary proceedings and the legislative process involving the House before it can become law. Until Congress passes—and the President approves—the necessary legislation, the existing legal schedule remains in place.
For Comelec, however, the uncertainty is becoming increasingly difficult to manage.
The poll body is already spending money, preparing personnel and handling election supplies while Congress debates whether the election will actually take place.
And that leaves Filipino voters facing a crucial question:
Will November 2, 2026 remain the day they choose their next barangay and SK leaders—or will the country wait until 2028 for the next BSKE?
For now, the Senate panel has opened the door to a 2028 election, but the final decision has not yet been made.
Leave a Reply